Page 11 - July 2020 Issue
P. 11

ISSUES REGARDING THE LAW                                       BLIND JUSTICE

            by Margaret Heine

               JUSTICE CAN BE BLIND         (1935) that the Court said that blacks     42 USCS 1983 provides that      Harlow v. Fitzgerald.  A whistleblower lost
                                            cannot be excluded from jury service.  “Every person who, under color of any  their government contract for calling out
              William Penn in Some Fruits of  That didn’t mean that the juries were  statute, ordinance, regulation, custom or
       Solitud stated, “Justice is justly   necessarily composed of “peers”.    usage, … causes … any citizen of the   misuse of funds, misappropriations and
                                                                                                                       cost overruns.  They sued the government
       represented blind, because she sees no  There were a number of cases in which  United States … the deprivation of any  and then President Nixon.  The Court
       difference in the parties concerned. She  all black jurors were excluded by the  rights, privileges, or immunities secured  found that the government officials were
       has but one scale and weight, for rich  prosecution when the accused was  by the Constitution and laws, shall be  immune from prosecution as they had
       and poor, great and small.”          black.  This was addressed as late as  liable to the party injured…”       immunity.  The Court has expanded the
                                            1985 in Batson v. Kentucky, when the                                       role of qualified immunity by setting a
              In general, this is what our  Court determined that the ends of          The courts have interpreted this
       justice system strives to achieve.  We  justice would not be served by   section to mean that any person, including  standard which is used to this day: that to
       cannot be blind to the fact that the  allowing prosecutors from keeping all  police officers, prosecutors, or other public  overcome immunity, you have to establish
       justice system, its tenets and beliefs,  blacks off of a jury for a black  officials who misuse their authority can be  that a judicial decision exists which
       needs to realign on occasion and adjust  defendant.                      sued for their actions.  In the 1960 case of  contains the same facts and conduct that
                                                                                                                       found the officers or the official would not
       to the societal outcry for change.  In                                   Monroe v. Pape, the court found that police
       doing so, however, the justice system       Women have faced similar     officers could be sued for their actions  be shielded and that immunity would not
       must maintain orderly application of  biases.  Blacks beat                          against James Monroe, and   apply.
       the law and proper punishment for    women to the jury                              his entire family, all without     Next month, more on qualified
       abuse of the law.  That is a tough love  box by decades.                            a warrant or reason, and    immunity and its impact on the perception
       statement of the needs of justice.   Utah was the first                             lacked authority to harass  of justice.
                                            state to fully allow                           and arrest Mr. Monroe.
              Inequity and unfairly treating  women to serve on
       the accused in legal matters predates the  juries.  In 1898, Utah                           This was viewed as    In very improvement in our conceptions
       civil war.  In reviewing the history of  gave women the                             a reasonable means to keep  of justice, as well as in the machinery for
       legal cases determined by the Supreme  right to be jurors or                        the police and authorities in  the administration of justice, whereby a
       Court, there are numerous examples of  to withdraw if they                          check, and to have them be  closer approximation to exact justice may
       bias influencing juries and prosecutors.  were needed more at                       responsible for their actions,  be secured, will make for social peace,
       The guilt of the criminal being      home.  It wasn’t until                         when they were doing their  though the mere adjudication of
       determined by their ethnicity.  Before  the 1930’s when                             jobs.  This all changed in  conflicting interests will not remove the
       the 1900’s, it was primarily the Irish  women were seated                           1967 when the concept of
       who were falsely accused and not given  more frequently as jurors.  Thanks to  “qualified immunity” was developed in  conflicts themselves nor their cause. That
       a fair trial, then the Italians, the Jews,  the 19  Amendment giving women the  the case of Pierson v. Ray.     lies deeper than legislatures or courts can
                                                 th
       the Germans, and the Blacks.         right to vote in 1920, the Courts started                                  probe.
                                            to apply the 6  Amendment and the 14 th    The Court found that police
                                                       th
              Prejudice or injustice against  Amendment to give women a civic   officers should not have to choose between  THOMAS NIXON CARVER, Essays in
       other ethnicities may have been more  right to sit on juries and to allow  doing their job and the risk of suit for  Social Justice
       difficult to identify as most of those  women defendants an opportunity to  doing their job.  The police officers in this
       falsely accused were racially the same  have a jury of their peers include other  case had asked 15 Episcopal priests, 3 of  Margaret A.M. Heine is the principal
       as the jurors in the case.  To address the  women.  However, the states were slow  whom were black, to leave the coffee shop  counsel at Heine Law Group in Fullerton,
       inherent injustice of homogenous juries  to approve women as jurors, and it  at the bus terminal where they were going  California.  She is licensed in California and
       not necessarily representing the cross  wasn’t until 1968 when the last state to  to have lunch.  They refused, which was  Washington, and has authority to practice
       section of the populace, the Courts  hold out, Mississippi, finally gave  deemed, “a breach of the peace”, and all  before the Supreme Court of the United
       would ultimately decide that juries  women the right to be jurors.       were arrested.  The police officers, the city  States and the United States Court of
       needed to be comprised of all races and                                  and county were not held liable for false
       all genders.                                The Civil Rights Act of 1871  imprisonment, false arrest, and false  International Trade.  Her practice includes
                                            was passed to protect blacks from the  imprisonment.                       estate planning, wills, trusts, and probate as
              The Civil Rights Act of 1875  Ku Klux Klan and abuses being                                              well as business, real estate, and civil
       first gave blacks the right to sit on  committed against persons “of color”.    The concept was then greatly    litigation.  Email:  nbylegas@gmail.com or
       juries.  This Civil Right Act of 1875 was  This is embodied in United States Code  expanded in 1982 with the decision in  visit company website
       later overturned by the Supreme Court,  42, section 1983.                                                       www.margaretamheine.com.
       and it wasn’t until Norris v. Alabama
                                                                                 The lessons of history have taught us that
               CAUTIOUS REOPENING - COMING OUT OF THE PANDEMIC                 even during the most difficult times, we   ANYONE NEED ASSISTANCE?
                                                                                                                          CHECK OUT THE RESOURCES
                                                                               must protect and treasure our cultural
                                                                               institutions. Rancho Los Cerritos staff will   AVAILABLE BELOW:
         Rancho Los Cerritos is a space for  will be allowed on the site on a space-  continue to work to bring the historic voice  RESOURCES ~ There are thousands of
        everyone and they reopened on June 10th  available basis.              of the diverse people who shaped Southern  federal, state, and private benefit
        as a space of respite, relaxation, and  “Rancho Los Cerritos has always been  California to life for our community so that  programs that help pay for prescription
        healing for everyone.              a place of comfort for our family.  we can continue to share their stories well  drugs, health care, utilities, and other
         Visiting the site will still be free, but  During this time of uncertainty, special  into the future. You are a part of the story.  basic needs for adults over 55.
        visitors must reserve a timed ticket  places like the Rancho gardens are  - Susan Wise, Rancho Los Cerritos Board   www.benefitscheckup.org;
        online at RanchoLosCerritos.org/   needed now more than ever. We are   Chair                                             1-202-479-1200
        Reserve in advance to ensure that the  delighted to welcome you to consider    Explore our Exhibits Online          National Council on Aging.
        capacity of the site remains at a safe  our gardens as a place of respite for  Tea Through Time is the name of RLC’s new
        number. Tickets will be emailed to each  your family just as it was for ours.”  digital exhibit curated by Arts Council for
        guest; the email also details the new  - Jean Bixby Smith & Barbara Bixby  Long Beach intern Anthony Smyers, with
        visitor code of conduct. Walk-up visitors Blackwell, Rancho Los Cerritos Board  assistance from long-time RLC volunteer
                                           Members
                                                                               Kim Bemowski.
      July 2020                                                                                                                                         11
   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16